JPPalus
104eb04533

2 years ago  

demo  2 years ago  
include  2 years ago  
samples  2 years ago  
src  2 years ago  
Makefile  2 years ago  
README.md  2 years ago  
TODO  2 years ago  
gen_samples.py  2 years ago 
README.md
Graph untangling
Forcedirected graph layout simulates forces to give motion to vertices and arrange them in a way that is visually pleasing and/or reveals structure. The FruchtermanReingold algorithm assigns a repelling force to vertices pair of the graph, effectively pushing apart vertices so they don't overlap, and a attraction force between each adjacent vertices pair, thus dragging closer connected vertices. The forces attenuate when the vertices get respectively further apart or closer, and a global temperature also serves as a simulated annealing, capping the maximum vertex displacement at each iteration. As the forces between each component and the temperature gradually diminish, the layout stabilizes.
Another method, the Kamada Kawai algorithm, relies on the simulation of springs between each vertex, which strength is determined by the length of the shortest path between both vertices. The potential energy of each vertex, ie the sum of the energy of all its springs, is then computed. The goal being to reduce the global energy of the layout, each vertex is moved stepbystep until its potential energy is considered lowenough, using a Newton Raphson algorithm.
Implementation
Our implementation of FruchtermanReingold starts by positioning all vertices on a circle as this appears to favor "unmangling" compared to random positions. The radius of the circle is alway 1.0, and all further computations are performed with floating point values, without knowledge of the canvas dimensions. In consequence, contrary to the original FruchtermanReingold algorithm, no bound checking is performed, and the layout can spreed constraintfree. The final result is then scaled to fit into the canvas dimensions.
A Kamada Kawai algorithm is also provided, mostly for comparison purpose. Its complexity makes it rather unsuitable for larger graphs.
Results
Click for fullscale image
K6 graph
FruchtermanReingold  KamadaKawai  Graphviz 

x.xxs  x.xxs  x.xxs 
DOT file from graphs.grevian.org
Small dense graph
FruchtermanReingold  KamadaKawai  Graphviz 

x.xxs  x.xxs  x.xxs 
DOT file from graphs.grevian.org
Binary tree
FruchtermanReingold  KamadaKawai  Graphviz 

x.xxs  x.xxs  x.xxs 
Quad tree
FruchtermanReingold  KamadaKawai  Graphviz 

x.xxs  x.xxs  x.xxs 
Large graph with disconnected components
FruchtermanReingold  Graphviz 

x.xxs  x.xxs 
GML file from gephi based on dataset by M. E. J. Newman
It might take some twiddling of the k parameter (a constant used to compute attractive and repulsive forces between vertices), as well as of the number of iterations, in order to get a layout perfectly free of edgecrossing. A better solution could be to introduce a "finetuning" phase during which we slightly raise again the temperature (and possibly the k value?) so as to shake the layout a bit before cooling it down again.